Title: Création d'une Option Sciences (SVT, SPC, MATH) en classe de seconde (option de détermination)
Acronym:
Country: France
Download the case study (Fr)
Download the case study (En)
Acronym:
Country: France
Download the case study (Fr)
Download the case study (En)
Target group(s):
Number of people directly concerned by the initiative: More than 100 people
Summary
Approche pluridisciplinaire d'un thème pour développer le goût des sciences et faire acquérir une démarche scientifique afin de développer l'orientation positive pour les sciences.
- Pupils and school levels involved:
- Other: élèves de 2nde générale
- Educational personnel:
- Teachers
- Pedagogical advisers, inspectors
Number of people directly concerned by the initiative: More than 100 people
Summary
Approche pluridisciplinaire d'un thème pour développer le goût des sciences et faire acquérir une démarche scientifique afin de développer l'orientation positive pour les sciences.
Name of the organisation in charge: RECTORAT DE MONTPELLIER
Nature of the organisation:
Address: 31 rue de l'université Montpellier
Email:
Website:
Telephone: 0033 467914536
Fax:
Thematic(s):
Subject(s):
- Innovation in teaching and learning sciences at school
- Scientific culture
Subject(s):
- Physics
- Chemical sciences
- Mathematics
- Natural sciences (biology, environmental sciences including agriculture and agrofood)
Type: Regional
Cooperation with external organisations:
Management (investment) of the initiative: Requires dedicated staff
Financial issues:
Cooperation with external organisations:
- Research institute
- Science museums
- Project work of pupils
- Intervention of scientists / industry people in schools
- Visit or use of laboratories of research centres / industry by schools
Management (investment) of the initiative: Requires dedicated staff
Financial issues:
- Self supported initiative
Impact of the initiative: Regional impact
Products, outcomes and results:
Products, outcomes and results:
- Other: donner le goût des sciences et favoriser la poursuite d'études après le bac dans les domaines scientifiques;
- Awareness-raising for science (and technology):
- For science in general
- For science and research with girls
- Acquisition of competencies of the knowledge society:
- Skills to research and treat information
- Problem-solving skills
- Skills for analysis and synthesis
- Presentation skills
- ICT skills
Person interviewed: Jean Burger
General information
General information
What is the percentage of students in the schools studying science?
Describe briefly the initiative. What are its objectives? What are its main innovative issues?
The science option is an enseignement de détermination (a guidance subject), which is proposed to pupils when they enrol on their first year of upper secondary school (15- to 16-year olds) . It is part of a pilot project launched at the start of the 2004 school year by the Académie de Montpellier (local education area). Lessons are designed to give pupils a “taste” for science, in a multidisciplinary manner. They must therefore teach pupils how to use a scientific approach by seeking to develop qualities such as organisation, autonomy, initiative and imagination, while presenting science in an interesting and motivating fashion. The involvement of teachers from several disciplines in the project (mathematics, life and earth sciences, and combined physics and chemistry, at very least) makes it possible to used a mix of approaches to specific situations, research assignments or local problems. In 2004, this subject option concerned nine upper secondary school classes and one lower secondary school class (14- to 15-year olds). 27 science options were offered in 2005.
Dimension of the initiativeIs your initiative, project, action or activity, a stand alone thing or is it part of a wider mechanism such as a network of pilot schools at regional, national, international or European level? If so, which one? If possible, provide a URL to get more information about the wider mechanism.
The initiative is being piloted by the Montpellier local education area. It is currently the only local education authority to have established such a measure on a systematic basis. The Strasbourg and Caen Rectorates (local education authorities) have made this guidance subject available for a few classes. The idea of this subject option came from a mathematics teacher who had spent most of his career in Alsace. With some of his colleagues, he had launched “scientific option” for pupils in their first and even their second year (15- to 17-year olds) at a Strasbourg upper secondary school.
Was a link made between the initiative and the school development plan?
Yes
Was the innovative action for science action part of a larger school strategy to promote innovation in school education in general?
Yes
Does the initiative result from new policy or legislation?
No
Promotion and diffusion of the initiativeDoes the ministry or one of its representatives organise sessions between all schools and teachers involved to exchange good practice? Do you have to inform other schools or teachers about your innovative activities so as to disseminate the innovation? If so, by which way(s)?
A science officer has been appointed within each upper secondary school, whose role is to act as a contact point for their colleagues. All science officers regularly receive information from the local education authority, and each year they are invited to participate in two or three meetings or training days on the promotion of science. The local education authority furthermore asks teachers who run the science option to respond to questions and send reports on their activities at the end of each school year.
How was the project introduced to the whole school? Information meeting for all teachers? For science teachers? For parents?
The schools have publicised the science option during open days.
How were the outcomes of the innovative strategy disseminated within the own school?
The schools disseminated the results in various different ways, for example at exhibitions and workshops, which were sometimes organised by pupils for their school-friends or pupils from neighbouring lower secondary schools during the Fête de la Science (national science week).
ImpactIn which way has the introduction of the innovative approach had an impact on:
The way in which science is approached, taught or learned
Lessons are multi-disciplinary and based on an active learning approach (experimentation, problem-solving, etc.). The objective is to demonstrate that these subjects share a common culture. The subject option is jointly coordinated by teachers from the three subject areas over a weekly period of three (preferably consecutive) hours. This gives the teachers concerned a degree of flexibility for managing the three hours. Pupils must be in small-groups during activities which require this. It is desirable for teacher’s lessons to be scheduled over the year to make it possible, in some weeks, to devote all of the three hours to activities such as excursions, visits and conferences. Evaluation of pupils’ performance is facilitated by the use of a single notebook or folder for the subject option, and through the use of a single grade and an assessment by the option’s team of teachers in the term report.
The in-service training of the science teachers
There are currently no specific courses to provide science teachers with in-service training.
The interest of the pupils for science, the active involvement of children in learning science
This initiative is aimed at pupils who are interested in science but not necessarily already determined or very enthusiastic to do it. The goal is to help pupils adopt a positive approach to science and, even if they are not going to continue studying it, to give them a positive image of science and a real “scientific culture” as future citizens. Statistics tend to the shortfall in people going on to scientific careers is particularly noticeable among young women. This option could provide an opportunity for pupils to give shape to plans about their future and convince families with doubts to encourage their children to embark upon reputedly difficult studies. The teachers seek to ensure that those pupils who take this science option are inquisitive, interested and motivated by science, although they do not necessarily have to be very clever.
The percentage of students in the schools studying science
This option has worked very well since the first year. At the start of the school year in 2005, 27 options were offered. A survey was launched in October to find out what pupils in the second year of upper secondary school had chosen to do after having taken the science option in the first year.
What are the main benefits or advantages from introducing this new approach to science teaching? What was the main obstacle?
The main benefits lie in the multidisciplinary approach, which enables teachers to interact more together and helps pupils learn about scientific processes by understanding the links between the three subjects. The main obstacles lie mainly in the fact that teachers are not used to working in a multidisciplinary fashion. Neither do they have sufficient time to discuss between themselves during their working day. Furthermore, decentralisation of responsibilities to schools will mean that principals will have to choose whether or not to make staff available for this type of option within their overall budget. There is no national directive on this matter, only some recommendations.
Which main approach is considered: a STS (science, technology, society) type or a discipline-oriented one?
The approach is clearly multi-disciplinary in this initiative. This is in contrast to other guidance subjects in the first year of upper secondary school, which are generally in the languages or art field and focus on just one discipline.
InnovationIn which way is the initiative contributing to innovation in science education?
It uses new pedagogical or didactical approaches. How?
Through a multidisciplinary approach and the use of investigative methods, this initiative contributes to the renewal of pedagogical approaches.
It makes special use of ICT. How?
There are informal contacts between the local education authority and the teachers responsible for the science options. Certain pupils use ICT within the option.
It is built on co-operation with the local community: industry, research centre, university, science museums, European or national science associations etc. Explain!
At the beginning, a group worked with the Institut de Recherche et d’Etudes Mathématiques (institute for mathematics research and studies). The link between the science option and universities and research organisations will be made systematic in the long-term.
Project managementWho decided to implement this initiative? Why?
Following up an idea by a mathematics teacher, the Montpellier local education authority decided to encourage the introduction of a science option in the local education area’s upper secondary schools. Previously, there was no extra science option for pupils in the non-specialist section of the first year of upper secondary school. The aim of this new option was to develop pupils’ scientific culture by helping them to develop an experimental approach and take the initiative.
How does the team work? Distinction and repartition of roles? Existence of priority collective choices? How was the team made? Does the team work on other basis than voluntary work?
The science option is jointly run by the mathematics, life and earth sciences and physics/chemistry teachers. They jointly determine the working methods and topics. The teachers’ coordination meetings take place outside the formal work schedule.
What are the investments in offices and human resources? What are the material resources mobilized/granted? (credits, rooms, time...) Resources mobilized to create the networks (who is member of and how?) Meetings? Dialogue time?
The introduction of the science options has been done with no extra budget resources in the schools. Furthermore, the local education authority has provided no extra funds for this initiative. Local education authority services support networking, and inspections provide validation. Nevertheless, certain principals have made resources available for this option, because this gives it a good image in the school. A specific room is sometimes made available for the pupils and teachers on this option. Lastly, certain school science officers have some paid hours for this work, but this is not systematic.
What kind of collaborative work is set up? Existence of working sheets, Internet collaborative tools, documents, official texts sent to the persons? Who write them, send them? How everyone access to them? What is the degree of constraint of these items?
The success of this option is dependent on regular contacts, especially via the internet and/or working meetings between colleagues from the three subject areas concerned.
Investment of the administration and the school head Who has initiated this project? Does he/she delegate? Does he/she collaborate to the work (degree of effective participation)? Does he/she organize meetings? Does he/she promote the team work (timetable for instance)? Does he/she put forward the work inside and outside the school? Does he/she show interest for the action and persons (he/she do not take all the credit)?
Each school develops its own specific plans.
Which actors are mobilised around the project? Who works in the team? With whom does the team work (parents, communities, local educational institutions)? Who in the internal team does contact who outside? Why this person? What are the arguments? What are the strategies used? Who in the team belongs also to these external networks? Does an organised communication system exist in the school?
Each year, inspectors for the subject-areas concerned visit all of the science options, attending classes to assess the science option and to check that it is in line with original intentions. The chief inspector contacts the school principals when the science option proposed does not comply with the terms of reference proposed by the local education authority. A working group was set up in conjunction with the Montpellier IREM (institute for research on mathematics education) in order to pool information on the various experiences of the different upper secondary schools. http://www.irem.univ-montp2.fr/optionsciences/opsc1.html Partnerships have been established with teaching and research establishments, local authorities and approved associations.



